should i pursue punctuation on this medium? is it overrated? is it a prerequisite for perfection? languages are fallen modalities. language will always fail at consummately capturing, metaphrasing, paraphrasing, encapsulating, bladdy blah blah the ineffable tides of divine creation.
the moment you label me you negate me. kierkegaard (maybe, lolzz).
apply the latter's commentary to every resonant, perennial theme––if you've even tried to explicate any of these you've already profoundly failed. why should any of us conform to an orthodoxy that no longer elevates, serves us. there's a reason christ had to speak in parables. no one he was communing with was even proximate to where he was––they just weren't energetically there. he was doing the best he could to convey selected themes within the constraints of a broken modality––the language aramaic, assuming the historical consensus is accurate.
do you have any idea how uncomfortable an incomplete person feels next to a complete person hmm? ever notice how fast ugly girls learn to hate pretty girls?–-the requisite pretexts for their resentment and their own existential validations will always enter scene, rite on schedule, forever and always, until the end of time.
if a single punctuation mark waylays me, i'll deprive it of its existence. grammar is a human implement founded on a pragmatic concern for clarity, not truth. i'll let the scyophantic editors, critics have their grammatical masturbations as they desire in the years to come. i take my cues from Priscian. perhaps i'll dabble in both orthodox and heterodox semantic and lexical styles as i feel compelled, in intuitive proportions and prudent allocations.
LS
pee es. lucid dreamt for the first time ever last nite. 😈