until the end of time.

your romantic storyline, delineated: boy meets girl, girl coaxes boy inexorably into his psychic submission, boy commemorates his acquiescence to a lifetime of female control by buying girl a twenty thousand dollar blood diamond. lmAo.

in my revised script––the original divine storyline––boy meets girl, boy looks prettier than girl doing it, boy collapses girl into existential and spiritual crisis that collapses hierarchical black magik power structures and births the new five dee world.

ask the question and don't wait for the answer. the answer has always been the same. girls run circles around boys in the modern era, capitalizing on sexual and psychic leverage that they've wielded since the dawn of time.

exhibit ay––not for the faint of heart: engaged ingénue wants to suk and fuk enrique iglesias on stage at his concert. lmao!

to be fair, she must have been off of birth control that month.

now, before you freak out and begin justifying, explaining away our young protagonist’s behavior, allow me to diagnose what you just observed.

some of my readers––indeed, even my male readers––will protest that any conclusions emanating forth from a singular video like this cannot possibly be accurate or revelatory, that context is important, that i need to be fair to the weaker sex, that most girls are so loyal!, blah blah blah.

but if you're at all enticed in this politically correct (and more emetic) direction, you're not paying attention. or perhaps you don't want to––perhaps you have a vested, egoic incentive not to pay the requisite attention.

and you haven't learned from maybe the greatest psychosexual field experiment yet captured––and perhaps my preferred video in the youtube compendium.

if the mise en scène is perfect, the relational context is sublime. it appears that, just moments before her prurient transgression, our busty maiden publicly revealed her personal backstory––explaining to enrique, and his concert audience broadly, that she was celebrating her birthday that nite with friends, and that her fiancé was at home, unavailable for comment.

in the proximate wake of this admission, enrique begins to serenade our girl protagonist with one of his acclaimed songs hero, which visibly reduces her to a puddle of teenage female hormones basically instantly.

as he commences his serenade (at around 0:20), tell me honestly what the chances are that her thoughts are with her husband to be meticulously attending to the dishes at home hmm? lol. now adumbrate the probability cloud that, in her heightened, liminal, sexually charged state, the only thing she feels––the only thing she knows––is the sustained, tingling sensation between her legs as she takes in the pop star's energy under the stage lites.

if you can summon the courage, let yourself evaluate her serene, guileless gaze––the default public female expressive facial form. watch her eyes as enrique ramps up his physical intimacy, his hands insolently grazing her perky breasts (her smiling, morally unencumbered acquiescence to which would probably be sufficient to impel any boyfriend slash fiancé to mental insanity, lollz).

let yourself perceive the full force of her *reflexive* energetic and sexual submission to the preeminent latin pop star of the modern era––to an energy signature so overwhelming, so unfamiliar, so manifestly undeniable––the brute strength of which apparently enough to collapse her into starry–eyed amnesia, and perhaps the embryonic stages of narcissistic self-delusion (he's authentically in love with me).

and all of this transpires as a mindless, amoral female crowd hivemind––thoroughly apprised of her affianced status––amplifies, promotes, energetically sustains their deviant sexual chemistry. why. it's almost as if they're accessing our protagonist's heightened energy state vicariously through her as she plays out their sexual fantasies in real time. as their hero.

they cannot help themselves in the presence of his energy signature. and the inconvenient moistness between their legs is the reflexive, unconscious corroborator of the hypergamic instinct in play. and the harbinger of a custody settlement. sigh. girls will be girls.

 

maybe the most devastating take away from this exchange is that enrique, perhaps, believed he was giving this girl a gift that nite. lolz a gift with abundant reciprocal personal sexual benefits, to be clear, replicable in every city on earth––but a gift nonetheless. after all, what young girl wouldn't want to be summoned on stage to be swept off her feet by the object of her (pre)pubescent infatuation? but seriously. a part of him perhaps believed that he was granting her a beautiful, intimate experience she could cherish and relive with her friends and family until their dying days in a decaying, forgotten corner of the world. which is likely the moral rationale invoked by most celebrities congregating with the great unwashed during their virtue–signaling orgasm service projects across the third world.

but what he doesn't realize (and what all eminent energetic playmakers who enter and exit disparate energetic contexts on autopilot never seem to realize) is that he has ruined her life forever.

because what happens in the wake of that concert, in that silence after the lites go off?––as the confetti degrades on the stage in the empty arena somewhere in the third world where a star, for one fleeting moment, coaxed a girl out of her spiritual and sexual mundanity and into his world forever.

forever isn't hyperbole. that's the thing about energy signatures. once they permeate, once they land, they never really go away––especially the superhuman, transcendent ones. these leave indelible scars on the human psyche, particularly female psyches––which, unlike their male counterparts, are shells, thoroughly amenable to energetic imprint, positive or negative.

so where does our leading girl retreat to in the darkness of the nite, long after the sun has set? what can she do in the wake of this energetic exchange––the contrast between his world and hers defined now so clearly, evinced so patently, so stark, so overwhelming?

where does a four go after she's accessed, gotten a taste of, a ten, however ephemerally––in the wake of an energetic exchange she was never supposed to have?

what will she feel now when she and her fiancé make love hmm? what thought patterns will surface now as she tastes her fiancé's lips again, peripherally evaluating his early onset 'dad bod' in the cold lite of day, now that she's gotten a taste of something so much better?

when she wakes beside her 'soulmate', i wonder if she'll yet find his snoring endearing. will his absent six pack be yet attributable to his tireless work ethic and lack of time because he's such a good provider? or i wonder if that lie on automatic repeat now begins to quietly recede into a distant corner of her mind.

there is an out. she can train herself to forget. her supernatural capacity for self–induced amnesia and cognitive dissonance––the prototypical female art form––having worked once, twice, infinite times before, will save her from herself again.

because even before the li(t)es of the arena have faded, her retroactive mitigation strategy is already in play.

can you see her now, communing with her heartbroken fiancé in the early hours of the next morning––her eyes saccading around their makeshift living room, a gesture strategically ostensive of overpowering thoughts and emotional disquietude––as she affirms to him that what she has with him is real, that she was drunk, and that she cherishes him for who he is on the inside!, for his kindness and generosity and undying loyalty, blah blah you know how this story goes.

can you see her.

as she begins a rehearsed diagnosis of their present impasse, let her words––infused with that prototypical female inaneness you've come to know so well––fade into a bleary, distant backstory of your awareness.

for the first time in your life, i want you to focus now on her furrowed brow. allow yourself to contemplate the contrived corrugations on her forehead, effectuated to signal spiritual perturbation and emotional vulnerability and an intellectual depth that isn't there. note the masterful subtlety of the accentuation of her gaze––genetically and epigenetically perfected over eons across infinite lineages and distant geographies, every immaculate detail of her physiognomy premeditated to evince purity so unrelentingly.

he's confronting her now, straining all of his cognitive faculties to summon a challenge to her pathological revisionist history.

she's responding to his accusations, her cheeks failing to suffuse with characteristic color as she fails to 'recall' the 'details' of her 'experimental', horizontal college years––her perpetual drug-induced stupor, the litany of virile fraternal boys (and girls) she rode into bouts of ecstasy once upon a time––revealing a cognitive dissonance so compulsive, so surreal.

she answers emotionally that she wasn't even attracted to him!, that physical appearances don't matter to her anymore, and that she has 'matured' beyond 'superficial' trivialities like physicality, which are fleeting and inane. contemplate the waxing and waning forms of her lips as she (tsk tsk) effortlessly cognitively pushes back memories of all the physically endowed men she pursued and sucked and fucked and loved when she was younger, hotter, tighter.

can you palpate the relief in her awareness that her beta bux has not accumulated the requisite sexual history (n=1.5) to evaluate the size of her vaginal canal contextually-–rendering this variable wonderfully irrelevant? and even if he were able to make the requisite discernments, love transcends trivial variables like sexual history, duh.

she pauses now, her gaze deadening for a moment, her pupils bearing down upon a distant corner of the room––a contrived, evolved intelligence-signaling behavior designed to convey her vulnerability, her omgz unmitigated emotional desperation, her victimhood. watch her gesticulate exaggeratedly as she enumerates her soulmate's myriad virtues to him in succession––the preeminent ones among these being his 'integrity' and 'generosity'. notice how her gaze softens as she recites all of his socially endorsed 'inner qualities' in a vacuous outpouring of cliché––the euphemistic subtext of which confirming his voluntary enrollment into emotional and psychic enslavement.

 

not long from now, like clockwork, she will be telling him that she loves him, and that she will love him for the rest of their lives, until the end of time. that 'they' can 'overcome' this (her failures are shared with him––her successes are her own). and her swarthy husband to be––confronting her palpable affection for him and apparently sincere desperation (himself perhaps not destined to win catch of the year any time soon)––will persuade himself that she was just having a 'fun time' and acting 'silly'. he will tell himself the lie that what they have is real.

and what she will bury-–what she will try to tuck away thoroughly forever––is the truth. her awareness that the only thing that was ever real was the pre–cum effluent secreting into her black lace cheekies as she communed with a star on stage last nite in a dark arena filled with fog. a star with whom both she and her fiancé could never hope to compete, energetically, physically, spiritually, existentially, whatever.

...her masterful, preemptive contemplation of the backstory she memorized and recited so mercilessly sincerely. the efficacy of the lies she danced, the ensuing victimization performance she staged. the vulnerable and innocent desperation act she feigned. the certain inevitability of the forgiveness she never craved––the assured pardoning of her lactating, ineffectual beta bux who plays at four inches and change.

all men in 'love' only have to ask is, who would she be fucking if she was hot enough to have anyone she ever wanted?

the female psyche quietly gets high off of sins unredeemed, transgressions unsurfaced, unreconciled, buried away forever.

even as it professes to adore you, it is always privately evaluating, appraising, making plans to upregulate––all whilst publicly pretending to be lost in a dark scary forest on the precipice of tragedy. there is no resonance, no elegance, no enduring spirit in that game––only the tides of waxing and waning lust, the (presumed) inevitability of biological degradation, and the desire to capitalize on youthful beauty and the attention of alpha fux before the lites go out forever.

pretty girls learn to hate me fast because i can articulate their psychic playbooks like they breathe.

amethyst is the chromatic intermediary between red and blue––someone call morpheus. 

cupid never wielded a bow but a nepenthe.

LS

pee es. to the dumpy feminazi cunt collective whose worldview i just collapsed, no, i’ve never had my heart broken. 😈

morphological proclivities.

should i pursue punctuation on this medium? is it overrated? is it a prerequisite for perfection? languages are fallen modalities. language will always fail at consummately capturing, metaphrasing, paraphrasing, encapsulating, bladdy blah blah the ineffable tides of divine creation.

the moment you label me you negate me. kierkegaard (maybe, lolzz).

apply the latter's commentary to every resonant, perennial theme––if you've even tried to explicate any of these you've already profoundly failed. why should any of us conform to an orthodoxy that no longer elevates, serves us. there's a reason christ had to speak in parables. no one he was communing with was even proximate to where he was––they just weren't energetically there. he was doing the best he could to convey selected themes within the constraints of a broken modality––the language aramaic, assuming the historical consensus is accurate.

do you have any idea how uncomfortable an incomplete person feels next to a complete person hmm? ever notice how fast ugly girls learn to hate pretty girls?–-the requisite pretexts for their resentment and their own existential validations will always enter scene, rite on schedule, forever and always, until the end of time.

if a single punctuation mark waylays me, i'll deprive it of its existence. grammar is a human implement founded on a pragmatic concern for clarity, not truth. i'll let the scyophantic editors, critics have their grammatical masturbations as they desire in the years to come. i take my cues from Priscian. perhaps i'll dabble in both orthodox and heterodox semantic and lexical styles as i feel compelled, in intuitive proportions and prudent allocations.

LS

 

pee es. lucid dreamt for the first time ever last nite. 😈

revenge of the fallen.

once upon a time i had a dream. tell me what this means.

i'm in a dark parking garage reminiscent of batman's lair. an elder friend prepares his sickeningly beautiful car for a ride out, commenting distractedly to me that the alternative energy models aren't perfect yet. i silently agree.

together we confront my mother. he tells her he's pure magic and shows her by manifesting a jade egg in his hands out of thin air. then i do the same, though i'm pretty sure mine was white? i'm momentarily inside my mother's mind, and she's so confused, almost sad.

then he tells me i can be anything i wanna be. i can even be ironman, or something similarly archetypal. soon i'm in the air, careening through the night sky. i find a girl who's struggling amidst the currents of a waterfall. then she falls. i catch her before she strikes water and she's so relieved, grateful.

then i get cocky and ignore my dwindling energy reserves, and we start to descend. i'm no longer carrying just her, but two others, one of whom is my brother.

and so we fall. and as we fall we hit a plane-like vehicle that has also gone down but never really bothered to actually strike earth, its remains floating amidst the clouds, a precariously poised docking station in the heavens, kind of like a silent 'fuck you' to Gravity™. so we strike it inadvertently and the entire construct begins to slip. we hold onto it for dear life. then the others, including my brother, jump off. as they jump and shake the construct one of my MAP bottles slips out of my pocket, its cover removed, a hundred pills spilling out into the nite sky. my container of unpasteurized milk slips out from under me as well. for some reason these deaths devastate me even more than the imminence of my own. then i understand i need to jump as well. and so i dive into violent headwinds, collapsing into the breath of god.

as i fall i'm crying but i'm also in control. in my dream i'm aerodynamic af, and my descent speed easily outstrips the others'. i descend past them lightning fast and evaluate the grassy landscape below. a surreal calm comes over me, and in this moment i understand i need to slingshot myself around one among the myriad distant trees below, channeling my accumulated kinetic energy into centripetal force. so i can live.

i converge onto earth's plane four feet above ground, my hands grazing grass, eyes bearing down on an incoming tree. i finally make contact with the tree and grasp onto its spine for dear life, compelling myself to loop around it a million times until i slow down, eventually falling innocuously to the earth.

i exit scene weary and maimed and out of breath, still looking for my MAP, still looking for answers, still craving and seeking the peace and truth and other beautiful things that cannot die.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWfph3iNC-k

LS

anatomy of a narrative collapse.

ya for those yet inebriated on the NASA Cocktail™ in 2017, remember that it's actually okay to withdraw insights from both fringe and mainstream narratives as you rehabilitate your worldview.

for real. leave the Hegelian dialectics and false dichotomies to die.

why would one ever preclude from analysis, observation, reflection an entire ideological paradigm, no matter how thoroughly inculcated in, or removed from, mainstream consciousness?

when you're compulsively ensnared by––and proudly tout your autistic ideological subscription to––centralized globohomo media informational channels, this is actually called dogma.

contravene against this instinct––see how it feels, you might like it.

if you don't know everything you know nothing.

try and keep up.

LS

 

seventeen dimensional chess.

ya are you watching now as the Globohomo Media™––as well as disparate, dissenting factions of the alternative media––purvey the theme that the aureate–haired Playmaker™ from Queens is a puppet, an emissary for the deep state, an implement of a schizophrenic power–brokering transnational cabal.

personally, i'm deeply enchanted with this designation. if even relatively sophisticated alternative media savants are convinced that the preeminent political protagonist in play is a puppet in the hands of black magicians, what are the chances that the latter believe this as well hmm?

while hysterical girls lambaste trump for his decision to send a volley of cruise missiles at a pre-abandoned Syrian airstrip, Chateau Heartiste correctly interprets this geopolitical play:

From the optimistic, 4D Chess Master Trump side, we have:

– Trump sidelining the pro-immigration CEA chair.
– Bannon attending an NSC meeting one day after he was reported to have been removed from his role with the NSC.
– China President Xi visiting on the same day Trump ordered the missile strike.
– GOPe cucks, neocons, and Dem shitlibs hungry for Putin-Trump collaboration evidence being made to look silly by Trump’s “anti-Russia” move.
– reports that Trump tipped off the Russians (who would tell Assad) about his “retaliatory” missile strike.
– the fact that the only thing blown up was an airstrip.
– SoS Tillerson giving very mealy-mouthed assertions about finding a way to eventually ease Assad out of power.

The 4D Chess Master Trump camp believes he ordered the missile strike to:

– flex power ahead of Xi meeting.
– genuinely strengthen deterrence against any nation thinking about using chemical weapons.
– extend a trivial political favor to his neocuck foes (who are gullible and will savor it) in exchange for yuge progress on his domestic issues. See: Gorsuch, the Wall (coming soon).
– smoke out the globalist Deep State by tying them to evidence later revealed by Trump of rogue agents coordinating the gas attack with Syrian rebels.

Does this feel like whiplash to you? Maybe it should. It’s part of Trump’s MO. The Chess Master Trump proponents are in awe of Trump’s ability to out-wit the globohomoists with his tactical retreats that turn into strategic victories, but there is a risk to feeding your enemy a false belief in his pyrrhic victory over you. Perception matters, and it’s hard to escape the optics of the globalists getting Trump to betray his stated principles with this missile strike against Syria. Trump tweeted a lot about the folly of getting involved in Syria; now he’s involved.

The danger of sacrificing a stated principle (no matter how small the actual sacrifice) for a longer-term gain in power, is that it erodes the trust of one’s supporters and it gives one’s enemies too much leverage in the short-term. Anti-Trumpists will be emboldened by Trump’s self-betrayal, and as Trump manipulated them, they will manipulate Trump. Just as Trump can lob a few token missiles to awe cucks and advance his nationalist agenda, so too can cucks stroke Trump’s ego with tokens of support for irrelevancies while advancing their true globalist agenda.
— https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2017/04/10/trump-the-4d-chess-master-or-trump-the-puppet/

Chateau also writes:

Ultimately, I think Trump sincerely has some nationalist leanings, really does know what he’s doing most of the time, and wants to do right by the American people….BUT I also think he’s got vulnerabilities (a need to be loved, for one), is open to manipulation by treasonous apparatchiks who will exploit Trump’s unfamiliarity with how the federal globalist government works, and might have an insufficiently skeptical eye toward (((elements))) within his inner circle. Trump’s non-ideological pragmatism and paucity of allies within the military-government-industrial complex could open him to victimization by hardened ideological antagonists who would seed Trump’s administration with ideological subversives.
— https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2017/04/10/trump-the-4d-chess-master-or-trump-the-puppet/

ya what is the correct formula for collapsing satan's house of cards?

differentiate between Malevolent Design and Machiavellian Divinity amidst the drama of the modern era. demons disguised as angels, angels disguised as demons––where does demon end and angel begin? transgress irreverently against linear, facile diagnoses of the temporal storyline––stray from the banausic, lose your patience for the reductive, and step into the real. it's way more fun up here.

learn to access source code and break your friends' myopic, nihilistic hearts. pretentiously evaluate their confused gazes as you delineate the temporal playbooks of kings and queens in real time. your behavior will leave them disoriented and tired and in a daze––quietly humiliated and anxious for sleep as they collapse to the centers of themselves.

to those who would inanely condemn trump as one of [them], never forget that Snape intimately communed with Voldemort up until the eleventh hour. remember that sometimes our closest loved ones are surreptitiously orchestrating our downfall––sometimes our open enemies are quietly contriving our salvation.

our eyes are bleary in the midst of all the lies. keep your eyes on the exit scene. the race is long, stay with me––i promise this is going somewhere special.

LS

physiognomy is real, the series.

tfw when Science!™ backfires in the face of the academic orthodoxy and undermines the globohomo lie of Equalism.

http://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-00071-5

as a recent study by the amoral chinese affirms, physiognomy, and physicality broadly, are deeply evocative of our character, neurology, psychology, et al. we abstain from pre–judgement of physicality, physiognomy and biomarkers ay bee and see at our peril. physiognomy is real––superficiality is depth.

this study––and the other politically incorrect scientific studies in its class (readily excised from public contemplation by the Globohomo Media Apparatus™)––should be sufficient to objectively collapse the lie of equalism presently straitjacketing the virtue signaling minds of western culture. what are the odds that libtards' prototypical cognitive dissonance kicks in rite about the time they come face to face with the implications of any of these studies hmm?

the aesthetic prerogative is an existential prerequisite, a sublime, divine imperative––evolutionary socialism is a lie.

LS

planar prerogatives.

#uhoh

ya evaluate: photoshop missteps delineated in the post–truth era, sorry to break your cosmologically deluded heart. lmao.

i'm sure the Skeptics!™ will have fun with this one.

pee es. ever notice how the atheist, 'secular', 'skeptic' pundits (see: neil degrasse tyson, richard dawkins, et al) always tend to buy mainstream narratives hook line and sinker? they don't even remotely demonstrate skepticism for any of the pre–demarcated mainstream narratives in any genre. skepticism is just a code word for defense of orthodoxy-–namely, the scientific, cosmological, geopolitical, cultural, et al orthodoxies.

they've taken these orthodoxies––and their accompanying narratives––so far up the ass they can barely see.

it's *almost* as if their absolute defense of orthodoxy––and disdain for heterodoxy––is premeditated, pre–ordained by black magicians behind the scenes.

LS

leptokurtic frequency distributions.

what themes, concepts would you reflexively, unconsciously consign to that proverbial wastebasket entitled pseudoscience hmm?

stray from the scientific orthodoxy absolutely in this era, remember intellectual irreverence is sublime. what we see is a trick, the endgame stages of a black magician's exquisite sleight of hand, a shadow on the wall.

LS